CAFOs and Environmental Justice: The Case of North Carolina

References and Notes

1. Wing S. Social responsibility and research ethics in community-driven studies of industrialized hog production. Environ Health Perspect 110(5):437–444 (2002);

2. Zublena JP, et al. Soil Facts: Swine Manure as a Fertilizer Source. Publication AG-439-4. Raleigh, NC:North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service (updated Dec 1997). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

3. EPA. Managing Manure Nutrients at Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Aug 2004). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

4. Lowman A, et al. Land application of treated sewage sludge: community health and environmental justice. Environ Health Perspect 121(5):537–542 (2013);

5. Marks R. Cesspools of Shame: How Factory Farm Lagoons and Sprayfields Threaten Environmental and Public Health. Washington, DC:Natural Resources Defense Council and Clean Water Network (2001). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

6. Wilson SM, Serre ML. Examination of atmospheric ammonia levels near hog CAFOs, homes, and schools in eastern North Carolina. Atmos Environ 41(23):4977–4987 (2007);

7. NRC. The Scientific Basis for Estimating Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations: Interim Report. Washington, DC:Committee on Animal Nutrition, National Research Council (2002). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

8. Ciganek M, Neca J. Chemical characterization of volatile organic compounds on animal farms. Veterinarni Medicina 53(12):641–651 (2008);

9. Wing S, Wolf S. Intensive livestock operations, health, and quality of life among eastern North Carolina residents. Environ Health Perspect 108(3):233–238 (2000);

10. Thorne PS. Environmental health impacts of concentrated animal feeding operations: anticipating hazards—searching for solutions. Environ Health Perspect 115(2):296–297 (2007);

11. Schiffman SS, et al. The effect of environmental odors emanating from commercial swine operations on the mood of nearby residents. Brain Res Bull 37(4):369–375 (1995);

12. Bullers S. Environmental stressors, perceived control, and health: the case of residents near large-scale hog farms in eastern North Carolina. Hum Ecol 33(1):1–16 (2005);

13. Horton RA, et al. Malodor as a trigger of stress and negative mood in neighbors of industrial hog operations. Am J Public Health 99(suppl 3):S610–S615 (2009);

14. Wing S, et al. Air pollution from industrial swine operations and blood pressure of neighboring residents. Environ Health Perspect 121(1):92–96 (2013);

15. Furuseth OJ. Restructuring of hog farming in North Carolina: explosion and implosion. Prof Geogr 49(4):391–403 (1997);

16. Baharanyi N, et al., eds. Focus on Black Belt Counties: Life Conditions and Opportunities. Proceedings of a Preconference of the 50th Annual Professional Agricultural Workers Conference, Tuskegee, AL, 5–6 Dec 1992. Tuskegee, AL and Mississippi State, MS:Tuskegee University and the Southern Rural Development Center (1993). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

17. Wimberley DW. Quality of life trends in the southern Black Belt, 1980–2005: a research note. J Rural Soc Sci 25(1):103–118 (2010);

18. Calhoun SD, et al. Federal funds in the Black Belt. Rural Am 15(1):20–27 (2000);

19. Wimberley RC, Morris LV. The regionalization of poverty: assistance for the Black Belt South? South Rural Soc 18(1):294–306 (2002);

20. Wing S, et al. Environmental injustice in North Carolina’s hog industry. Environ Health Perspect 108(3):225–231 (2000);

21. Edwards B, Ladd AE. Race, poverty, political capacity and the spatial distribution of swine waste in North Carolina, 1982–1997. North Carolina Geogr (9):55–77 (2001);

22. Mohai P, et al. Environmental justice. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34:405–430 (2009);

23. Pulido L. Rethinking environmental racism: white privilege and urban development in Southern California. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90(1):12–40 (2000);

24. Attempts to get comment from the National Pork Producers Council and the North Carolina Pork Council on this question were not answered.

25. Brown P. Race, class, and environmental health: a review and systematization of the literature. Environ Res 69(1):15–30 (1995);

26. Bryant B, Mohai P, eds. Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards: A Time for Discourse. Boulder, CO:Westview Press (1992).

27. Ringquist EJ. Assessing evidence of environmental inequities: a meta-analysis. J Policy Anal Manage 24(2):223–247 (2005);

28. Anderton DL, et al. Environmental equity: the demographics of dumping. Demography 31(2):229–248 (1994);

29. Evans GW, Kantrowitz E. Socioeconomic status and health: the potential role of environmental risk exposure. Annu Rev Public Health 23:303–331 (2002);

30. Brulle RJ, Pellow DN. Environmental justice: human health and environmental inequalities. Annu Rev Public Health 27:103–124 (2006);

31. Edwards B, Ladd AE. Environmental justice, swine production and farm loss in North Carolina. Sociol Spectr 20(3):263–290 (2000);

32. Edwards B, Driscoll A. From farms to factories: the environmental consequences of swine industrialization in North Carolina, 1982–2007. In: Twenty Lessons in Environmental Sociology (Gould K, Lewis T, eds.). New York, NY:Oxford University Press (2008).

33. Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production. Putting Meat on the Table: Industrial Farm Animal Production in America. Philadelphia, PA and Washington, DC:The Pew Charitable Trusts (2008). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

34. DeLind LB. Social consequences of intensive swine production: some effects of community conflict. Culture Agric 26(1–2):80–89 (2004);

35. LeDuff C. At a slaughterhouse, some things never die: who kills, who cuts, who bosses can depend on race. How Race Is Lived in America [special series]. The New York Times, online edition (16 Jun 2000). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

36. USDA. Livestock Slaughter [website]. Washington, DC:National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (updated 25 Apr 2013). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

37. Farm Forward. Factory Farming [website]. Portland, OR:Farm Forward (2013). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

38. Starmer E, Wise TA. Living High on the Hog: Factory Farms, Federal Policy, and the Structural Transformation of Swine Production. Medford, MA:Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University (Dec 2007). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

39. Stith P, Warrick J. Murphy’s laws: for Murphy, good government means good business. Raleigh News & Observer (22 Feb 1995). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

40. McKown AM. Hog Farms and Nuisance Law in Parker v. Barefoot: Has North Carolina Become a Hog Heaven and Waste Lagoon? Agriculture Law Research Article. Fayetteville, AR:The National Agricultural Law Center. Available: [accessed 22 May 2103].

41. NCDACS. 2012 North Carolina Agricultural Statistics. Raleigh, NC:North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services/National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (2012). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

42 Thu KM, Durrenberger EP. Pigs, Profits and Rural Communities. Albany, NY:State University of New York Press (1998). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

43. GAO. Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations. EPA Needs More Information and a Clearly Defined Strategy to Protect Air and Water Quality from Pollutants of Concern. GAO-08-944. Washington, DC:U.S. Government Accountability Office (Sep 2008). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

44. Burkholder JM, et al. Impacts of waste from concentrated animal feeding operations on water quality. Environ Health Perspect 115(2):308–312 (2007);

45. Burkholder JM, et al. Impacts to a coastal river and estuary from rupture of a large swine waste holding lagoon. J Environ Qual 26(6):1451–1466 (1997);

46. Gerba CP, Smith JE Jr. Sources of pathogenic microorganisms and their fate during land application of wastes. J Environ Qual 34(1):42–48 (2005);

47. Silbergeld EK, et al. Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. Annu Rev Public Health 29:151–169 (2008);

48. Gibbs SG, et al. Isolation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria from the air plume downwind of a swine confined or concentrated animal feeding operation. Environ Health Perspect 114(7):1032–1037 (2006);

49. Huffman RL, Westerman PW. Estimated seepage losses from established swine waste lagoons in the lower coastal plain of North Carolina. Trans ASAE 38(2):449–453 (1995).

50. Westerman PW, et al. Swine-lagoon seepage in sandy soils. Trans ASAE 38(6):1749–1760 (1995).

51. Huffman RL. Seepage evaluation of older swine lagoons in North Carolina. Trans ASAE 47(5):1507–1512 (2004);

52. Burns JD. The Eight Million Little Pigs—A Cautionary Tale: Statutory and Regulatory Responses to Concentrated Hog Farming. Fayetteville, AR:The National Agricultural Law Center, University of Arkansas (1996). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

53. EPA. Animal Waste Disposal Issues. Washington, DC:Office of Inspector General, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

54. Warrick J, Stith P. New studies show that lagoons are leaking: groundwater, rivers affected by waste. Raleigh News & Observer (19 Feb 1995). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

55. Cole D, et al. Concentrated swine feeding operations and public health: a review of occupational and community health effects. Environ Health Perspect 108(8):685–699 (2000);

56. Tajik M, et al. Impact of odor from industrial hog operations on daily living activities. New Solut 18(2):193–205 (2008);

57. Wing S, et al. Air pollution and odor in communities near industrial swine operations. Environ Health Perspect 116(10):1362–1368 (2008);

58. Schinasi L, et al. Air pollution, lung function, and physical symptoms in communities near concentrated swine feeding operations. Epidemiology 22(2):208–215 (2011);

59. Wing S, et al. Community based collaboration for environmental justice: south-east Halifax environmental reawakening. Environ Urban 8(2):129–140 (1996);

60. Fry JP, et al. Investigating the role of state and local health departments in addressing public health concerns related to industrial food animal production sites. PLoS ONE 8(1):e54720 (2013);

61. General Assembly of North Carolina. S.L. 1997-458. HB 515: Clean Water Responsibility Act. Effective 27 Aug 1997. Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

62. General Assembly of North Carolina. House DRH30306-SB-6: Swine Farm Env. Performance Standards/Funds. Effective 1 Jul 2007 and 1 Sept 2007. Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

63. NCDACS. 2012 Annual Report on the Implementation of the Lagoon Conversion Program. 2012 Semi-annual Report on the Pilot Program for the Inspection of Animal Waste Management Systems. Raleigh, NC:Division of Soil and Water Conservation, North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (9 Oct 2012). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

64. Karan A. Pigs, Profit, Planet: North Carolina Farmers’ Perspectives on Waste Lagoon Conversion [undergraduate honors thesis]. Durham, NC:Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University (Dec 2011). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

65. Wing S, et al. The potential impact of flooding on confined animal feeding operations in eastern North Carolina. Environ Health Perspect 110(4):387–391 (2002);

66. Development of Environmentally Superior Technologies for Swine Waste Management per Agreements Between the Attorney General of North Carolina, Smithfield Foods, Premium Standard Farms and Frontline Farmers [website]. Raleigh, NC:Animal and Poultry Waste Management Center, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University. Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

67. Attorney General of the State of North Carolina. Agreement between the Attorney General of North Carolina; Smithfield Foods, Inc.; Brown’s of Carolina, Inc.; Carroll’s Foods, Inc.; Murphy Farms, Inc.; Carroll’s Foods of Virginia, Inc.; and Quarter M Farms, Inc. Raleigh, NC:Office of the Attorney General, State of North Carolina (25 Jul 2000). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

68. Premium Standard Farms, Inc. Annual Report, Filed 5/16/2005 for Period Ending 3/26/2005. Kansas City, MO:Premium Standard Farms, Inc. (2005). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

69. General Assembly of North Carolina. S.L. 2011-118. SB 501: An Act to Facilitate Improved Operations and Conditions at Certain Preexisting Swine Farms by Providing for the Construction or Renovation of Swine Houses at Those Farms. Effective 13 Jun 2011. Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

70. Bindell R. Hog Waste Is Dragging North Carolina Through the Manure [weblog entry]. (11 May 2011). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

71. Prasodjo D, et al. A Spatial-Economic Optimization Study of Swine-Waste Derived Biogas Infrastructure Design in North Carolina. Durham, NC:Duke University, Duke Carbon Offsets Initiative (April 2013). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

72. The Loyd Ray Farms Swine Waste-to-Energy Offsets Project [website]. Durham, NC:Duke University (2013). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

73. EPA. Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) [website]. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (updated 16 Oct 2012). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

74. United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice. Toxic Wastes and Race at Twenty: 1987–2007: A Report Prepared for the United Church of Christ Justice and Witness Ministries. Cleveland, OH:Justice and Witness Ministries, United Church of Christ (2007). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

75. Bullard RD, ed. Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice and Communities of Color. San Francisco, CA:Sierra Club Books (1994).

76. The PCB dump was remediated in 2004. See: Bullard RD. Environmental Racism PCB Landfill Finally Remedied But No Reparations for Residents. Atlanta, GA:Environmental Justice Resource Center, Clark Atlanta University (12 Jan 2004). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

77. GAO. Siting of Hazardous Waste Landfills and Their Correlation with Racial and Economic Status of Surrounding Communities. RCED-83-168. Washington, DC:U.S. General Accounting Office (1983). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

78. EPA. Environmental Equity: Reducing Risks for All Communities. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Jun 1992). Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].

79. EPA. Environmental Justice [website]. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (updated 20 May 2013) Available: [accessed 22 May 2013].


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *